From Woody's Couch

Our Playbook on OSU History

Category: Buildings (page 14 of 25)

Home a hard place to find for past OSU women undergrads

Oxley Hall residents, 1931

Oxley Hall residents, 1931

Women undergraduates who attend OSU today should be thankful for the times in which they live. If they had attended the University during its first 50 years, they would have had to work a lot harder to find a place to live here.

Though women attended OSU from the day it opened its doors in 1873, they did not have a dorm until 1908 when Oxley Hall opened. Even then, Oxley Hall housed only 60 women, and there were 600 women enrolled at that time. So until Oxley Hall, women had the options of living at home – if they were from Columbus – or living in area boardinghouses.

Part of the reason for the dearth of campus housing was financial: At the time Ohio State depended much more greatly on state funding, which was miniscule compared to other state universities. For instance, while the University of Michigan received $274,000, and the University of Wisconsin was given $92,736 from their respective state legislatures for the 1881-1882 academic year, Ohio State received $21,950.

It also was not a top priority for OSU’s first leaders; the university’s first president, Edward Orton Sr. never made such a funding request to state lawmakers, for example. (Granted, he had a lot of other things going on, like starting a university from scratch.)

Mack Hall residents, 1924

Mack Hall residents, 1924

It wasn’t until OSU’s fourth president, James Canfield, that there was a concerted effort to offer campus housing to women, which culminated in the construction of Oxley Hall. Slowly, the campus options increased with the construction of Mack Hall in 1921 and the purchase of Neil Hall in 1925. Women who lived in the dorms were supervised, and did most of the cleaning and other chores in the dorm. They had a curfew and were prohibited from having male visitors except for certain hours on Saturday and family visits on Sunday.

With very limited space at the University, sororities became a very popular choice: Ohio State had 25 sorority houses by 1925. These were considered the next best option for out-of-town students because like the dorms, they were socially acceptable to parents and the University, with each house having a “house mother” and sharing the University standards as to curfew, rules and living conditions. There were also houses supervised by religious entities, such as the Westminster Foundation, which housed a limited number of women students in an off-campus house.

Neil Hall women, 1929

Neil Hall women, 1929

If a student was unable to gain accommodation with family, or in a dorm or sorority, the student still needed a place to stay. Many girls opted to try to work for a family in exchange for room and board. This was not always the best solution; students sometimes would end up exhausted and unable to keep up with schoolwork.

After the appointment of the first Dean of Women in 1912, University staff inspected the rooms that girls rented in private homes to prevent unsafe living conditions. The Office then began keeping a list of boarding houses that could be recommended to students. To be on the list, the home had to pass the University’s inspection, there could be no male boarders in the boarding house and conditions had to be sanitary.

Apparently, some women students lived in conditions so poor that the University left certain campus buildings open, such as the Home Economics Building , so women students could use the bathrooms if their own rooms lacked suitable plumbing. And for all that, women paid as much as $5 a week, while male boarders usually paid $3-4.50 per week.

Filed by C.N.

Much of our information for this blog came from two dissertations on the early history of women at OSU, both of which are available at the Archives:

Sisters and Scholars: Women at the Ohio State University: 1912-1926, by Louise Ann Booth (1987)

Women at the Ohio State University in the First Four Decades: 1873-1912, by Pouneh M. Alcott (1979)

Home Ec students fight against exclusion

Wilhelmina Styles, 1932

Wilhelmina Styles, 1932

In 1921, the Department of Home Economics established a Home Management House to teach women students how to run an efficient home, as well as life skills, such as finances, nutrition, and child care. Students received credit for instruction in the laboratory center, where they lived together for roughly six weeks in a staged home environment.

Ten years later, Wilhelmina J. Styles, an African-American student, requested permission in May 1931 to seek admittance for practical training in the House for the autumn quarter. She was refused admission. (Although there was no set rule barring African-American students from campus housing, they instead lived in boarding houses or private homes.) Despite protests from local officials, business leaders and religious organizations, then-OSU President George Rightmire supported the decision; Styles was asked to substitute another Home Ec course for the home-management graduation requirement.

Doris Weaver, 1933

Doris Weaver, 1933

Home Management House, 1937

Home Management House, 1937

In May 1932, Doris Weaver applied for a reservation in the House and was accepted for the autumn quarter. Subsequently, after learning Weaver was African-American, the department withdrew Weaver’s confirmation for participation in the House.

Then, Ohio Rep. Chester K. Gillespie, the only African American in the Ohio General Assembly at the time, intervened on Weaver’s behalf with a series of letters to Rightmire. He also asked that the state legislature begin an investigation for possible discrimination. Shortly after, the OSU Interracial Council – made up of student representatives of the YMCA, YWCA, International Club and Council of Women, among others – filed a protest in support of Gillespie’s charges discrimination based on race.

President Rightmire, 1932

President Rightmire, 1932

At a subsequent hearing before a House committee, Rightmire denied barring Weaver from the House because of her race. He said she had been offered exclusive use of part of the house but had refused the offer.

Gillespie then threatened to revoke funding to OSU because African-American students were not allowed to participate equally in the House program. Eventually, Weaver’s case went to the Ohio Supreme Court, which supported Rightmire’s assertion that Weaver was not being denied equal opportunity since she and other African-American students were offered exclusive use of certain sections of the house.

The ruling did not deter Weaver from continuing her studies; she received a bachelor’s degree in Home Economics in March 1933 and went on to earn a master’s degree in 1936. According to a 1981 interview, she taught at Wilberforce University for seven years – along with Wilhelmina Styles – in that university’s Department of Home Economics.

For more information on these women and other African-American students’ experiences at OSU, please see Pamela Pritchard’s 1982 dissertation: “The Negro Experience at the Ohio State University in the First Sixty-Five Years, 1873:1938, with Special Emphasis on Negroes in the College of Education.”

 

Twelve Days of Buckeyes: “3” apparently is a charm for the chemistry department

1887_chemistry_1_fire_damage

Chemistry Building #1 after fire, 1887

OSU’s chemistry department got off to a rocky start: Originally housed on the third floor of University Hall, it was soon moved to a newly constructed building on the site of, most recently, Brown Hall. When a fire started in the department’s new building in 1887, the whole structure burned down because of a lack of water to extinguish the flames.

The next chemistry building was built two years later on the site of the present Derby Hall. It burned down in 1904. A recounting of the incident said there were “ludicrous happenings due to excitement” that occurred that night.

Chemistry Building #2, 1904

Chemistry Building #2, 1904

Apparently, the firefighters were afraid of the chemicals housed in the building, so they did not try to put out the flames (whether or not the chemicals were a threat is not known). However, that did not stop students from entering the burning building and attempting to save the contents, including bottles of distilled water.

The third chemistry building, now known as Derby Hall, was rebuilt in 1906 on the site of its predecessor. It, too, caught fire soon after it was completed; however, the building was saved. Its first addition was, of course, a fire-proof storage shed for the chemicals. No doubt this helped to break the curse.

 

 

Filed by C.N.

Older posts Newer posts